Blogs

Some Suggestions For The Originators’!

There are Inventors who ne’er Invented a thing, YET, have Patents in their Names; not as Applicant(s), BUT, as Inventors! Same goes for the Designs, Copyrights, Trademarks! Somehow, investors, innovators, &, representations, are becoming inventors / originators. And this ain’t a thing to be flabbergasted about! This has been happening for centuries; only the methods…

One Question -> When The International Law Has Already Fallen With The Fall Of Venezuela, Where LEGALLY We Are Heading W.R.T. WIPO, TRIPS Etc. Treaties?

Take this Important Example: My Client begs and borrows money, to pay WIPO’s Fees, and now awaiting for a decision on a good faith, knowing that he / she has  not done anything wrong. But the person against whom my client has filed a Petition, belongs to a Nation, that has Bad Relations with My…

Tricky Question -> Should Processed Food Companies Be Using Labels Of GI (Geographical Indications) Related Goods & Products?

This one would be interesting to contemplate. Let’s say you’re a beverage manufacturing company. Now issue is you’re allowed to use the Washington Apples or Alphonso Mangoes; BUT, the problem comes that, even as a primary ingredient, the composition of those mangoes or apples are sold in diluted form; diluting the significance of GI only.…

Just An Opinion -> If In Late 90s OR Early/Mid 00, You Had Harvested / Scrapped / Mined DATA On The NET, The Way Today’s Few AI OR Web Search Companies Did; Then Honestly, Even A Search Notice Might’ve Been Issued Against You By The Likes Of Interpol, For Doing Such Acts!

Every second person is into AI today, diluting the whole context and concept, why and for what, AI was initially invented at the first place! BTW, how many are in Quantum Computing? Or deriving more powerful Chips? Hardly few! Because it’s difficult, and as in it, Free scrapping of DATA isn’t involved! What was once…

Thanks To The Hon’ble Munich Court For Upholding The Fact That AI Companies Training Their Modules SANS Permission Is An Act Of Infringement!

The AI companies’ submissions that only USER is responsible for the infringement, as the USER entered a specific PROMPT, can be held a VALID argument, ONLY in case when the USER starts using that generated TEXT or IMAGES for Commercial purposes, and Not for personal or R&D activities or related to similar things which genuinely…

I Honestly Humbly Silently Remotely Passively & In Remorse -> Slightly Disagree With Observations Made In GETTY IMAGES VS STABILITY AI Case!

Take this example & please do correct me if I‘m (mis)interpreting anything wrongly. And before that, please know that I Support OPEN Source, But NOT the Quote -> Open For Thee Not For Me! Let’s say there’s Subject ABC who steals Raw Materials from WALMART and later builds a new product from it! WALMART files…

The Dilemma Of Ex-Parte Orders?

So far, I’ve given extensive in-depth knowledge on IP, International IP Prosecutions, all at one place on my blogs, so much so that whether you’re a Startup, or, maybe an Experienced Professional looking forward to discover some Extensive Dilemmas in the IPs & International Prosecutions; then Nowhere Else in the World you will discover this…

How Article 33 Should Be Read! My Dilemma!

How Article 33(1) be read with Article 33(2) & (3), I’ll elucidate in the herein underneath paragraphs, as it has been wrongly read Globally.   If any claim passes the litmus test of Article 33(1) sans hiccups, then it ought to have passed the litmus test of Article 33(2) & (3). But I’ve no idea…

Can The Laundering Of Domain Names Under The Ambit Of Ownership Ever Overrides The Rights Conferred TO Act Against Cybersquatting?

The dilemma of the Domain Name Registrars is, they are contending for the Domain Name Ownership Rights, by bypassing the Rights conferred both by the WIPO and TRIPS regarding TMs to act against Cybersquatting/Typosquatting. Let’s say in the 00s, I started hoarding the domain names, anticipating that a day, I would be able to sell…

Personality Rights, But Why Only For the Known, & Not For All?

Take this example, and we must take some inspiration from this law. Denmark has recently given Personality Rights to all of its Citizens in the age of Deepfakes! This is a welcome step wherein in few of my previous blogs, I called many top AI Companies in the World as alike somalian pirates! As the…

The Reason Why Discovery Is The Foundation Of An Invention!

There’s this myth of inventions being novel! Inventions wouldn’t happen unless discovered first. Examples: All the medicines today were first discovered in the Plants, Tress, Roots, and then, their steroidal compounds were extracted in the Labs, synthesized, and marketed via innovations! There’s nothing in the World called a Novel Invention. That’s why more than decade…

How Domain Names AND Trademarks Are Being Juxtaposed -> WRONGLY!

One is territorial, and another is universal; yet, when it comes to the UDRP, the effect of Cybersquatting is treated as a universal phenomenon even in the case of the cctld domains, and let’s say for the gtld’s too; knowing the trademarks themselves are territorial. Thus, the juxtaposition complexity and dilemmas! The Awards can be…

The Dilemma Of Prima Facie!

Patents ain’t Prima Facie! Trademarks, Copyrights, G.I., Designs Are! Domain Names? Explicitly Nope! Implicitly Yes (because of different cctlds and gtlds, and without even its registration, where the context of domain names even arose?). The only thing what prima facie grants you is the exclusive Infringement Provision in the latter four cases to the rights…

Why I Always Contended To Equate Geographical Indications Similar To That Of Copyrights (Minus Timelines Of Rights Bestowed & Requirement For Registration)!

Because, alike in BERNE for Copyrights; and as Article 22 of TRIPS also provides G.I. protection to the member nations of the Agreement, but now, delete the expiry timelines, as one is perpetual, whilst the other not; and albeit one can seek protection of G.I. even in other nations, alas, needs to be registered therein…

The Reason Why Certificate Of Inventorship Doesn’t Serve ONE Specific Purpose!

In one of my earlier blogs (Link: https://www.jpranavc.in/2024/06/certificate-of-inventorship-needs.html ) and before the certificate of inventorship was introduced, and even before that, I wrote another blog, the need of such prospective certificates’, the embedded link of which is included in the above blog only, are indispensable. But in that blog, I cited that the purpose of…

Please Don’t Juxtapose Piracy Over Copyright Infringement By Making Latter A Cognizable Offense!

We are unnecessarily confusing Copyright Infringement with Piracy, by making the former equivalent to a cognizable offense, which to me, would not only kill creativity, that in any case was already absent, but, would further stretch doing the things which could’ve already been resolved vide civil injunctions, penalties, or by removing/withdrawing of the infringed content.…

Should Oppositions in T.M.s Be Replaced With Likes Of S.19 Everywhere? And My Dilemma That’s Still Trying To Build Like Bob The Builder!

This is another of mine proposed Theory, just alike others (of course all Protected)! So, here’s the new theory goes! You’ve this provision in every IP Office, in case of Trademarks, the Registrar bearing the power to recall its decision of acceptance i.e. withdrawing the acceptance of any trademark before the registration itself! Correct? Now,…

There’s Still A Glitch In the Domain Names Implementation!

Shouldn’t the cctld be restricted for country specific ‘residents’ only everywhere, like in the cases of .us, .eu, .jp, .fr etc. usually? As many of the other cctld’s are not covered with the same security features & measures! And the reason is -> why would someone else would need another country’s cctld, while operating from…

Issue With Any Trademark Accepted With A Disclaimer! And My Dilemma Riding On-> Thomas The Train!  

Restricting to any Demography is understandable in the Disclaimer Clause! BUT, I never understood, especially, when any trademark is considered as whole, why then restricted disclaimer clause is attributed for certain words in it, especially in the Device Mark itself? This creates an issue later, even at the time of adjudging the opposition or rectification.…

The Customs, &, My Dilemma Climbing the K2 Peak!

This is just my personal opinion! Let the entire Trademark database be connected to the Customs Database. So instead of individual registrations for the generation of Specific Registration numbers, let the custom’s intelligence portal be prompted with the similar IP at the time of any trade or transaction, and then, an automatic suspension of goods…

The Raga Of DAGAR Brothers VS Rahman Copyright Infringement Case!

AHA! I wrote earlier about the difference between what constitutes public domain works, and the works in public domain which are protected by the Copyrights. When these LLM training companies started misleading the public in general that the works they are using are being considered under the ambit of public domain works, I vehemently opposed…

The Copyright & The Ghibli Art

There’s a grey area that I have been discussing in the field of Copyrights for long in my blogs, when it comes to the style, vibes, themes and the idea as well! Technically, can styles or vibes be copyrighted, as one must have read the case of an influencer who filed an infringement petition on…

The Grey Area B/W Provisional Priority VS Anticipation!

Dear Diary, I’ve no idea whether this part was looked by someone else, but, the other day, I had this dilemma, as, can the concept of Self-Anticipation, which is similar to the concept of Self-Plagiarism, be also applicable w.r.t. to the Provisional Filing Priority? But how am I going to prove that? Take this example:…

The Future Of WIPO In A Post DE-Globalized World!

I’m wondering, as in the First wave de-globalization has been triggered, what would be the status of WIPO, i.e. Hague, UDRP (Other Domain Name Redressal Arbitration Boards), Madrid, PCT; and if in case the First Wave is successful, policies/rules of WIPO would hardly be followed then; again, if in case the First Wave becomes successful,…

The CRI Guidelines, Section 3(k), Software Non-Patentability, AND, My Dilemma Hiding In The Labyrinth!

You may be a supporter of OSS, Open Platforms, Trade Secrets, Licenses, or Patents; perspectives differ. When it comes to Algorithms, this is true that they should’ve been covered everywhere under the ambit of Copyrights only, and never under Patents, as Algorithms are after all LITERARY STEPS or Methods written in literary wordings with no…

Looking Patents Once, From The Lens Of Trademarks!

This is one of my dilemmas of dilemmas’ in the labyrinth of regulations. Now, you would ask this question to me, that how come I can jumble up these terms and definitions Patents & Trademarks? But again, I’ve captioned in the subject line that, looking only once the Patents from the lens of Trademarks, and…

A.I. Hallucination, AND, Submission Of Case Precedence!

There’re few incidents wherein A.I. hallucinations resulted in the action against those in the legal sector who submitted wrong case precedence that never even existed. The onus was put on AI stating that it is the AI that hallucinated by the ones who quoted the case precedent, albeit latter were being penalized due to the…

My Dilemma, Change In Name Of Trademarks, As Subsequent Proprietor/Owner!

What defines transmission, assignment, transfer, or change in name per se; should that matter at the time of recordal of the subsequent name, when the entire due process had already been followed, of course, except in the case of when consent or approval is supposed to be taken for the recordal of transmission, assignment, transfer;…

The Specific Gap Between Madrid Filing + The Amendments!

Forget for a moment about five years’ time period wherein if changes made at the office of origin would also affect the international registration. My concern is different. The problem comes where, let’s say, amendments are filed at the office of origin, and then, in a short span of time, a new Madrid Application is…

My Dilemma: Why Need NEW AI Acts When Already Have IP/IT Acts?

When the new EU AI Act came, and when I hear from Politicians to Bureaucrats speaking about the necessity for the new AI Acts and Rules; are they referring to mere self-regulating AI guidelines, or, explicitly asking for new AI Acts, my dilemma gets lost in the labyrinth of sub- dilemmas, as, do you require…

A Matter Of Concern That Must Be Discussed……!

Q.1. If the cost of DeepSeek is mere under $10M, then for what Big AI Companies were seeking, investing, justifying, Billions of Dollars in the name of AI, and then to be used, where? Q.2. It is also in the open (no matter what percentage of it is true), that the AI Giants used the…

Lodha VS Lodha: The Trademark SAGA

Please read my earlier blogs first regarding when it comes to names and surnames, who qualifies for the ownership on that trademark. The links are as given below: https://www.jpranavc.in/2023/11/the-trade-mark-case-involving-trump-too.html AND https://www.jpranavc.in/2021/10/rights-on-name-surname.html Now, the recent case between Lodha VS Lodha ain’t different, with the exception that, now, same family members are involved. And if someone remembers,…

When Democracy Became Algocracy!

The ‘democracy’ was already replaced by ‘algocracy’ with the spread of plague of social media platforms! So, sometime back, and when I was on twitter (now deleted), this is what I wrote to Twitter’s Jack’al: and even before that, kept writing about the authentication of the accounts on the internet, even VIA domain name registration…

Why DATA Principal Was Even Defined In DPDP? My Dilemma!

I’m sure after reading this blog, you would think, I’m raising unwarranted, unwanted, out of the context, issues & definitions. But I’m writing this blog for the reason, I came across to few platforms, where, the definition of the Data Principal has been expanded to include the ‘person’ as well, as I’ll explain in the…

Should There Be Any Limitation Timeline For Copyright Infringement?

Let’s separate trademarks, designs, G.I., Patents, and Domain Name Disputes for a moment first, when it come to the infringement proceedings, from the Copyrights (especially in case of sound recordings, musical notes, and cinematography). For the reason that, what is neither compulsory for any industrial applicability, nor for any USER to be proven, nor for…

Mulheres VS Million Years Ago Plagiarism Saga, BERNE’s Resurrection, IP, Timeline Dilemmas!(Edited)

I saw the side-by-side comparison of the song Mulheres VS Million Years Ago. It seems, the latter is replica of the former. Watch the comparison by yourself, the musical notes and the rhythm:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjszPUsjWbA&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2F The important question: acquiescence, laches, delay, condonation, waiver! Albeit, generally, acquiescence period usually for trademark is 5 Years; limitation period…

Opinion: IP, Outer Space, AND Why WIPO’s Madrid/PCT Can Ne’er Work!?

There are contradictory terms w.r.t. Outer Space Treaty, TRIPS, and the jurisdiction involving where IP Rights can be covered; within or beyond Karman Line! Albeit examples are present, like T. 35 U.S.C. S. 105 mentions that, any invention made used sold in outer space object under jurisdiction and control of US shall be considered to…

Copyrighting VIBES?

This blog is restricted to Words -> ‘Copyrighting VIBES.’ No more! No less! What exactly is a VIBE? In Personal context, an Emotional State! An experience of something being exuded by any other Person. In the Material context, maybe Surroundings, let’s say specifically, a decorated room, that gives a feel! But what if in both…

Transshipment, In-Transit, Customs, IPR, Dilemmas!

Take this example. Suppose, Subject A sends goods (let’s presume generic pharma products) to Subject C. But Subject A can transport its goods VIA Subject B (transshipment/in-transit/en-route) only. But Subject B confiscate the goods sent buy Subject A on the complaint filed by the local companies under the jurisdiction of Subject B, on the grounds…

Why Patent of Addition Is ‘Un’required!

Take this example. On a more elaborative context, aren’t improvements or modifications made on the main invention itself eligible for new invention? We aren’t taking an analogy per se of associated nor of the setories marks, but, the term being same as of the main invention, and, been filed at the time or after the…

The Customs, The IP, The Dilemmas!

Can infringement action w.r.t. entire IP be taken at Customs office only? Answer is both Yes & No! In case of Copyrights, S. 53 is restricted to the Importation of infringing copies of goods. In case of Trademarks, S. 29(6)(c) cites infringement, when import/export are involved. Patents, as in the amendments of the IPR Enforcement…

Can DATA Be Processed Ethically?

Who decides what is the price of the DATA itself? Emily Dickenson poetries didn’t sell in her lifetime, and there are several other Authors & Painters who became famous posthumously, including Vincent Van Gogh, whose works were understood only by the later generations to come; so, by harvesting the DATA available in the public free…

Seems The Words ‘Public Domain’ AND ‘Public’ Confused Everyone W.R.T. Copyrights!

First understand the meaning of Publication: What is publication? By making the work available to the public via issuing of copies, communicating to the public, could be physical distribution / lending, in electronic form, transmission, broadcasting, or vide any other medium. If you publish without license, then this is NOT considered as publication. For Copyrights,…

Make Ghostwriting ILLEGAL Across World!

In one of my previous blogs, I proposed that the Certificate of Inventorship is NOT enough! Not only that certificate should include the details of the contribution made by every Inventor, but the same procedure be applied for whilst filling the Declaration of Inventorship. Of course, and it is absolutely acceptable and correct when the…

Data Collection + Data Reproduction == Copyright Infringement!

This is utterly amusing that, some of the AI companies, are now issuing such bizarre statements, that the Data which is available in the Public domain, is presumed to be open for everyone, and in one case, even one of the billionaire founder made a statement that when, if in any case your Data is…

Maybe There’s No Necessity For The Concept Of Trademark As A WHOLE!

Take this hypothetical example first. Let us consider BMW X7 as a DEVICE Mark. Now as BMW is well-known, no one would imitate it. But presume, someone starts using X7 for their products or services falling either in same or different classes. Could that be considered as an infringement/passing off? Let us say, the individual…

The Case Involving Ukraine’s Trademark On Russia

In one of my previous blog, before even the Hon’ble S.C. of U.S. judgement, I wrote that the Applicant who filed for Trademark viz. ‘Trump Too Small’, WON’T win, and that too, a year back! This was ratified months later. Here’s the link given below: https://www.jpranavc.in/2023/11/the-trade-mark-case-involving-trump-too.html Now, the EU Court has correctly denounced Ukraine the…

Can NATURE Be Granted Personhood?

In 2017, Whanganui River was granted the personhood in New Zealand. That means, a River with a legal person status. If you remember Naruto Monkey’s case involving a Selfie, when PETA wanted animals to become Copyright holders too, i.e., bestowing them legal entity status under the IP Act. Albeit, the courts disagreed, as a monkey…

AI VS Judiciary VS Reasoning

If the Judiciary can use the AI for its services, be it at the intermediary stage maybe, then how come Courts can question about the AI’s ‘Reasoning’ part itself, when defining the definition of the Natural Person? Even under the Law, once a person stops applying the reasoning, then in the decision-making process, for example,…

What Is Useful, May Not Be……

This is true that what is useful, may not necessarily be an invention. Rather, most of the invented products are not even useful. A company would show their portfolio of Intellectual Property, in which, they’ve piled up patented products, trademarks that are meant to be Proposed to be Used only. Yet, most of that stock…

When IPRP == IPER, OR, Should It Be?

The lucid the law, lucid its implementation. And minimal the terms, the better the understandings. In the end, if the Demand is not filed, then ISA/WO becomes IPRP published before the regional entry. And if the Demand is filed, then the IPRP becomes IPER == IPRP –> II, aka Chapter II, issued by the IPEA.…

This Is Amusing……

This is amusing! I read this article (Philosopher finds glitch in worldwide patent laws). But, if you go through my blogs on my blog portal, then not only I’ve found flaws in the Worldwide Patent Laws, but also in the Madrid Procedures, BERNE Convention, w.r.t. Examination Reports issued under the ISA (IPRP, SISA, ISR, or…

NOBEL VS AI

In my previous blogs, I discussed the cusp where AI can, or, ought to have been considered as an Inventor, if not an Applicant, or atleast a Joint Applicant or one of the inventor signing the declaration of inventorship. Further, I discussed and tried to distinguish w.r.t. computer generated literary works, that in those circumstances,…

The Specifications and ITS Many Dilemmas

In one my previous blogs I discussed that, even in u/s 10(4)(c) and 10(5) or u/r 13 of Patents, it’s not precisely mentioned how the structure of the Claims should be defined, except the non-mandatory guidelines of WIPO that’s been followed. And if further you read Article 6 of the PCT, it defines that Claims…

The Dilemma of S. 2(d)(vi) in the Copyright

What it says; says every section and article around World that defines an Author, when it comes to the computer generated related work: ‘…..in relation to any literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work which is computer-generated, the person who causes the work to be created…..’ Now, I’m not invoking the Natural person concept in the…

AI vs Provider vs TMs, And Dilemmas About Identities!

In the EU AI Act of 2024, in the definition of the Provider, it includes two specific terms: first is ‘…..legal person…..’ and another is ‘……puts the AI system into service under its own NAME or TRADEMARK….’. I would be restricting to the Trademark definition that further involves ‘legal person’ and as in my book…

The Dilemma OF Floating Domain Names After Non-Renewal

In my previous blog, I opined that the trademarks shouldn’t be removed or rectified in the register, if in case of non-use; unless of course, in case in the event of non-renewal. Further, I rather suggested a proposition that the trademarks shall be suspended if in case of non-user, rather being opened for the public…

The Dilemmas of UDRP

Just an Opinion! Now, if one looks at Paragraph 4(k) of the UDRP Policy, then the scenario of non-implementation / approaching independent resolution w.r.t to the decision of the Panelist(s) (one or three) is as mentioned: My contention is (could be opposed too) that the remedy available for the cctld (let’s say at any national…

The Period Between Priority and Publication!

A dilemma I discussed about the infringement invoking retrospective rights between the period of publication and date of grant. But the question ensues, what about the period between priority and date of publication, which has not been discussed by many, even explicitly not been mentioned in the act itself, as per my knowledge and belief,…

The Infringement Provision In Patent

One is familiar with the infringement proceedings with respect to the trademark, as in that case, the mark needs to be registered first, in case the proprietor wants to act w.r.t. infringement. The mark should be valid & subsisting. And if in case registration pending/not registered, then the option is of passing off. Thus, even…

Atleast AI Shouldn’t Evolve VIA Random Harvested DATA!

Just alike PR + Recommendations == Trash! So as AI built on the foundation of random DATA, would eventually be an AI Trash! Further, it seems, the companies are now updating in their agreements, terms & conditions too w.r.t. Artificial Intelligence Content for a better transparent system, which is a welcome step! Under Your (User)…

Opinion: E-Contracts && IP

The essential component of any contract is Consideration in return; unless and until it is restricted to charity, gifts, family affections etc. Now, unless any organization is registered as a non-profit, or, there’s a family affection involved; generally, there must be some kind of consideration involved; until further that isn’t in contravention to any laws…

A Need to Re-Implementation of BERNE Convention!

Whether it comes to imitating in the mainstream; or the DATA on the Internet which is being used against the provisions of every single reciprocal treaties or TRIPS agreement; which was ought to have been restricted for personal & private use, R&D, academic only; YET, that has been used to train from AIs for ‘commercial…

What Defines Originality?

Whilst filing for the copyright, of course, one would be asked whether the work is original or translation or adaptation as shown below. But according to me, what is Copyrightable shouldn’t qualify to implicitly become Original, or be part of the term – > Originality. Let us take some examples. Can Work of Journalism, Podcasts,…

International Filing System Has Few Flaws!

If we can have copyright reciprocal treaties, why can’t that be the case for patents, trademarks, domain disputes without WIPO being involved? It’s understandable that everything comes down to how the payment at the local prosecution would be made, and as of course, the countries who file for most of patent and trademark applications, or…

Is PCT Relevant?

Notice the difference between the examination/scrutiny/objections in case of trademarks VS that issued in patents. In the former case, from the examination report to the scrutiny; include territorial prior works. Whilst in case of patents, examination reports consist of global prior arts, yet, if in case patent is granted, then rights are territorial only, like…

When Trade-Secrets Are Tried To Be Superimposed Over Patents!

It should be considered a wrong precedence if in case trade-secrets are being superimposed, or, tried to be superimposed over patents! The ‘generalized’ structure of the claims shouldn’t become the part of the specification anywhere. The non-inclusion of the precise metrics in the claims, in anticipation of then being used the same invention as a…

The Apple Watch Dilemma

Remember, Waymo vs Uber involving Levandowski’s case, wherein it was alleged that Levandowski stole trade secrets to then being used by Uber via acquired firm Otto, that Levandowski started, with all its IP assets, ending up Levandowski’s sentencing, whereas Uber-Waymo signing non-disclosed settlement agreement! But how’s this analogy can be applicable in the Apple’s watch…

Is Google Committing a Mistake?

Check the below tweet that I had sent couple of years back (when I was on Twitter) to google (gmail), microsoft (outlook), yahoo (yahoomail); indirectly asking them NOT to delete emails related data, unless & until been explicitly requested by the User itself.  Now, Google has announced that it will start deleting all inactive accounts,…

The Trade Mark Case involving ‘Trump Too Small’

In one of my previous blog, I discussed how and why using some well-known names or surnames which are already being traded in the market could cause infringement, despite the applicant itself sharing the same/similar name or surname. I cited some examples viz. Trump, Tata, Ford, Gucci & the list goes on. I further wrote…

The DPDP Saga

Few Questions & Review: All said & done, the Internet was already crumbled by the policies such as -> number of clicks + followers == payback to the users + paycheck to the resident employees + revenue for the company. Internet may never be ameliorated! © Pranav Chaturvedi

The Limits of Fair Use / Fair Dealing

There’s a difference between non-infringement vs. becoming actual claimant of the work produced to be then considered as protected under copyright, whether derived/adapted (eg. a theatrical act derived from any book which would explicitly require permission), or, transformed (eg. critical analysis & research that changes characteristics of original work to a greater degree, even without…

The Dilemma of Claims in Patents

There’s no (or shouldn’t be any) inflexible rule for drafting claims, for example -> all inventive features should come or characterized or comprised in Claim 1 only as independent or not, & the followed subsequent claims shalt be (in)dependent or derivatives of the first etc. The Claims (use, method, process/product, composition) shalt define the scope…

Data Scraping

With the new updated Google’s Privacy Policy read as: publicly accessible sources “For example, we may collect information that’s publicly available online or from other public sources to help train Google’s languageAI models and build products and features like Google Translate, Bard, and Cloud AI capabilities. Or, if your business’s information appears on a website, we may index and…

Use vs Territorial vs Monopoly

If the examination of any patent includes global application citations, then technically, is there any point of considering patent territorial, & furthermore making the use of PCT, then seems more redundant, unlike Madrid in TM, as citations differ in both, wherein latter is more territorially defined. If mere manufacturing for export is considered as use…

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.


Follow My Blog

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.

Leave a comment

search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close